Identifying Step |
Explanation |
|---|---|
| Identify databases you will search |
Including both general and subject specific databases. |
| Create a search based on your research question |
Using advanced search strategies such as combining synonyms with OR and using wildcards and proximity operators to find variants. |
| Translate the search | For each database using appropriate controlled vocabulary and correct syntax. |
| Store the results of each search |
Separately, using a citation manager. |
| Document each search |
Including:
|
| Search grey literature |
Such as:
to address publication bias |
| Search other sources | Such as reference lists, relevant journals that are not entirely indexed in databases, and researcher bibliographies. |
Step 1: Decide if the student assistant (or grad assistant) will be using Covidence to access the Review Team's work.
|
Yes, the student will use Covidence. Someone will need to create an account for the student assistant. Student access to the project in Covidence is the easiest and most efficient way to proceed. Student workflow suggestion: In Covidence, the student should
|
No, the student will not have access to Covidence. If the student assistant is not added to Covidence, then the librarian who is part of the review team or the library staff supervisor will be the point of contact and will need to decide the workflow for the student. Student workflow suggestion: Use Box and create a folder for the student. The student assistant will need a list of studies that need the full text retrieved. As the student finds the PDFs, they can upload them to the Box folder. This workflow is less efficient but provides some quality control and limits the number of non-team members accessing the project in Covidence. The librarian can decide who will import into Covidence. |
Notes
Step 2: Full text retrieval (two options):
|
Automated Process (using Zotero):
|
Manual Process:
|
|
Notes
|
Notes
|
|
Tracking Stats Please have the student record the number of full-text studies retrieved and the amount of time it took. Please provide this information to the student supervisor or librarian. Tracking helps us provide research teams with realistic expectations for how long it will take to complete this part of the review process. Thank you! |
Whomever has access to Covidence should tag articles that have been requested through Interlibrary Loan (ILL). Tagging articles in Covidence with tags such as “ILL sent” will help keep track of the progress.
Copyright © Baylor® University. All rights reserved.
Report It | Title IX | Mental Health Resources | Anonymous Reporting | Legal Disclosures