Skip to Main Content

Health Sciences Research Methods Guide

General research guide for health sciences students in Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences

Asking a right-sized question

Before you start searching, it's important to think about the scope of your question. A question that is too broad will produce way too many results, many of which won't be relevant to you. A question that is too narrow may not produce any results at all!

Finding a "right-sized" question to research will make the rest of this process much easier to navigate. How do you know when a question is right-sized, though? 

Something called "concept mapping" can help! 

Concept Mapping

A helpful way to determine the scope of your question is to break up your question into concepts. From there, you can determine which concepts to prioritize in your search strategy. This process will naturally help you create a well-formulated search strategy. 

First, we'll examine possible research topics and practice breaking them up into concepts. Then, on the next page (Acquiring Evidence), we'll use our concepts to effectively search for evidence in relevant databases. 

Below is a list of possible research topics that a student in Robbins College may be interested in: 

  1. Speech-language tele-therapy for rural children with autism 
  2. Impact of universal design kitchens on older adults' independence
  3. Effects of high-intensity interval training on adults with Type 2 diabetes
  4. College student food insecurity and academic performance 
  5. Impact of maternal nutrition education on infant feeding practices 

Step 1: 

In the health sciences, we often think about our research in terms of our population, exposure or intervention, and outcome. This concept modeling approach is often referred to as PEO. Please note, however, that PEO is one of many approaches used in the field. Other common frameworks are listed below and should be used when appropriate.

Let's use question 3 was an example: 

Population: Adults with type 2 diabetes

Exposure: HIIT exercise program 

Outcome: Cardiovascular fitness, blood sugar levels (A1C; Fasting blood glucose) 

Step 2:

Determine which concepts are most important for your search. 

For question 3, the exposure and population are important to search, but the outcome is not. As we look through results in the databases, the outcome we're looking for will likely show up without adding it to our search strategy. Often, we don't search for the outcome concept of our question, but it's important to have your outcome mapped out so that you can select the most relevant articles out of the search. For example, we might expect that outcomes will be measured by tracking study participants' blood glucose levels, and we can look out for this terminology when we comb through our results. 

Practice on your own

Take one of the other research questions (2, 4 , or 5) and try mapping out the concepts on your own. Then, determine which concepts are most important for your search. 

Common Search Frameworks

Framework - An established structure that helps define the research question.  Can address different disciplines and question types.

For example: PICO is the most common and well-known standard framework for medical and health systematic reviews.

Framework

Discipline/Question Type

PICO (Richardson et al. 1995)
Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome
Clinical medicine
BeHEMoTh (Booth and Carroll 2015)
Behavior of interest, Health context (service/policy/ intervention), Exclusions, Models or Theories
Questions about theories
CHIP (Shaw 2010)
Context How Issues Population
Psychology, qualitative

CoCoPop (Munn 2015) 
Condition, Context, Population. Sometimes called PCC

Medicine, epidemiology
COPES (Gibbs 2003)
Client-Oriented, Practical, Evidence, Search
Social work, health care, nursing
ECLIPSE (Wildridge and Bell 2002)
Expectation, Client, Location, Impact, Professionals, SErvice,
Management, services, policy, social care
PEO (Kahn et al. 2003)
Population, Exposure, Outcome
Qualitative
PECODR (Dawes et al. 2007)
Patient/population/problem, Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, Duration, Results
Medicine
PESICO (Schlosser and O’Neil-Pirozzi 2007)
Person Environments Stakeholders Intervention Comparison Outcome
Augmentative and alternative communication
PICO specific to diagnostic tests (Kim et al. 2015)
Patients/participants/population, Index tests, Comparator/reference tests, Outcome
Clinical medicine
PICO+ (Bennett and Bennett 2000)
Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, +context, patient values, and preferences
Occupational therapy
PICOC (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006)
Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Context
Social sciences
PICOS (Moher et al. 2009)
Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study type
Medicine
PICOT (Richardson et al. 1995)
Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time
Education, health care
PIPOH (ADAPTE Collaboration 2009)
Population, Intervention, Professionals, Outcomes, Health care setting/context
Diagnostic questions
ProPheT (Booth et al. 2016)
Problem, Phenomenon of interest, Time
Screening
WWH
Who What How
Health, qualitative research

Adapted from Foster, M. J., & Jewell, S. T. (Eds.). (2017). Assembling the pieces of a systematic review : A guide for librarians.

University Libraries

One Bear Place #97148
Waco, TX 76798-7148

(254) 710-6702