Questions?
This guide was compiled by librarians Amy James and Ellen Hampton Filgo. If you have any question about the content of these guides, please contact them.
For other questions, contact us at libanswers.baylor.edu or look up the librarian for your college/department/major.
Creative Commons 4.0 license
Feel free to copy this guide, in part or in its entirety, in your own LibGuide.
Please attribute “University of Arizona Libraries, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.”
AI detection tools
Many educators don't support the use of AI writing detectors
These detectors result in both false negatives and false positives, which can result in tagging a student paper as written by AI when it wasn't.
In addition, if your native language isn't English, these tools will often tag your writing as written by AI. See GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers - Weixin Liang, et al.
More information
- Nobody wins in a academic integrity arms race - The Chronicle of Higher Ed
- Making ChatGPT detectors part of our education system prioritizes surveillance over trust - George Veletsianos, professor of education at Royal Roads University
- What to do if you are falsely accused of cheating with AI - Dr. Lydon Walker, YouTube
- Vanderbilt University's Guidance on AI Detection and Why We’re Disabling Turnitin’s AI Detector
- Baylor's statement on why Turnitin's AI Detector was disabled.
Instructors are creating classroom policies on the use of generative AI.
Baylor's suggested syllabus statements about Generative AI.
Contains ideas for classroom policies.
Guidelines from other universities
Classroom Policies for AI Generative Tools (collected by Lance Eaton)
A crowdsourced collection of classroom policies on use of ChatGPT and other AI tools.
See also:
- Princeton University
- University of Illinois
- University of Michigan
- University of Pennslyvania
- University of Wisconsin, Madison (includes classroom activities)
- Yale University
