Step |
Difference from Systematic Review |
---|---|
Planning |
Follow PIECES |
Identifying |
Follow PIECES |
Evaluating |
Follow PIECES |
Collection |
Follow PIECES |
Explaining |
Synthesis is typically narrative with tabular and perhaps graphical accompaniment. Analysis focuses on what is known leading to recommendations for practice. Analysis also focuses on what remains unknown and the uncertainty around findings leading to recommendations for future research. |
Summarizing |
Audience tends to be the research community and practitioners. |
Step |
Difference from Systematic Review |
---|---|
Planning |
The research question can be broader and more topical. |
Identifying |
Same as for systematic review |
Evaluating |
Review all citations for inclusion due to relevancy Do not need critical appraisal |
Collection |
Not needed |
Explaining |
Synthesis is typically tabular with some narrative commentary. Analysis characterizes quantity and quality of literature, perhaps by study design and other key features. |
Summarizing | Audience tends to be the research community and practitioners but also policy makers and agencies Protocols are sometimes registered, and summaries submitted to peer-reviewed journals or as reports. |
Step |
Difference from Systematic Review |
---|---|
Planning |
Does not need a team. |
Identifying |
Completeness of searching determined by time constraints. May search fewer databases and grey literature sources. |
Evaluating |
Review all citations for inclusion due to relevancy. Critical appraisal maybe truncated due to time limitations. |
Collection |
Data collection more focused with fewer data elements. Sometimes data is directly put into tables rather than using forms. |
Explaining |
Synthesis is typically narrative and tabular. Analysis focuses on the auantities of literature and overall quality/direction of effect of literature. |
Summarizing | Audience tends to be policy makers and agencies. Summaries are often submitted as reports. |
Step |
Difference from Systematic Review |
---|---|
Planning |
Can be conducted by a single researcher. Do not need to pose a research question using an established framework or establish a protocol. |
Identifying |
May use comprehensive searching as for systematic review. |
Evaluating |
May use formal criteria for inclusion due to relevancy. May include critical appraisal. |
Collection |
Not needed |
Explaining |
Synthesis is typically narrative. Analysis may be chronological, conceptual, thematic, etc. |
Summarizing | Audience, summary type, and dissemination depend on the purpose of the review. Protocols are not registered. |
Step |
Difference from Systematic Review |
---|---|
Planning |
Same as for systematic review |
Identifying |
Same as for systematic review |
Evaluating | Same as for systematic review |
Collection |
Same as for systematic review May include sensitivity analysis |
Explaining |
Synthesis is graphical and tabular with narrative commentary. Meta Analysis incorporates a numerical analysis of measures of effect assuming absence of heterogeneity. |
Summarizing | Audience tends to be the research community and practitioners. Protocols are often registered Summaries are usually submitted to peer-reviewed journals. |
Copyright © Baylor® University. All rights reserved.
Report It | Title IX | Mental Health Resources | Anonymous Reporting | Legal Disclosures